JLS.615 Professor Fagelson Spring 2019 |
Materials |
Readings will be indicated throughout the Syllabus and will be made available either as a link or hard copy.
COURSE DESCRIPTION |
Content
This course will examine the nature and
application of human rights. An inquiry such as this must begin with
a conceptual and ethical over view about the nature of rights, law and
their justification. Once we have considered the various conceptual
and normative views of legal and moral rights we will examine various contexts,
such as military intervention in another sovereign state, protection against
genocide, and transfer of resources to poor nations, in which some
right is thought to apply. Finally we will also consider specific
rights to free speech, religion, privacy etc., to see what the basis is
for these rights and how, if at all, they are vindicated.
PREREQUISITES:
Although this is a graduate course there is no assumption that you have had any prior course about human rights. It is assumed, however, that you will have had some exposure to conceptual and normative (that is to say ethical) reasoning. The course also assumes that you have the capacity to synthesize information and present your own ideas orally and in writing. This course will help develop further your analytical skills particularly as they apply to legal and moral reasoning. This course is designed not only to teach you the ideas of others but also to help you develop the capacity to engage in original thinking and research to advance those ideas further. Hence, it is absolutely essential to have completed each reading assignment and to be prepared to speak in each class.
Class Requirements |
Grading (subject to qualification described below)
Due | ||||
Class Participation: | 20% | Passim. |
||
Exam | 25% | Feb 23 | ||
Analytical Paper: | 25% | March 26 | ||
Final Examination: | 30% |
Mon, May 6, 2019 | 02:30PM-05:00PM | |
Standards: Grading standards are
in part subjective and excellence in one area may compensate for deficiencies
in another. No curve will be used to calculate the grades in this class.
Hence, it is theoretically possible for every student to receive an A if
he or she meets the standards for that grade. My primary goals are for
each student to develop the critical thinking skills and to understand
the ideas covered in this course by the time it is completed. If later
exams and papers illustrate this proficiency, earlier grades which do not
will be discounted. The following will give you a general guide to the
typical performance associated with each letter grade.
A: all course requirements met, work shows full understanding of course material and an original perspective on the subject
B: all course requirements met, work shows full understanding of course material (or satisfactory understanding of course material and an original perspective on the subject)
C: all course requirements met, work shows satisfactory understanding of course material
D: work fails to meet minimum course requirements, either in full and timely completion of requirements or in satisfactory understanding of course material
F: work falls far below minimum course
requirements either in full and timely completion of requirements or in
satisfactory understanding of course material.
University and Classroom Standards
The American University's "Academic Integrity
Code" governing standards for academic conduct apply. Students may discuss
the subject matter of their essays with anyone. All students, however,
must compose their own essays and may not show or read their essays to
any other persons, except for proofreading or typing assistance by a person
not enrolled or previously enrolled in the course. The use of another person's
words or ideas without proper attribution constitutes plagiarism or false
authorship. Both are serious academic offenses. By turning in an essay,
a student is certifying that the essay is entirely his/her own work. If
there are any questions about this matter, consult the Academic Integrity
code or see the instructor.
***************
Freedom of expression is at the root of
academic discourse and the advancement of knowledge. This course will deal
with a wide range of topics, some of which may challenge a student's deeply
held beliefs and perhaps even cause offense. While no topic will be censored
simply because it has these effects, students are expected to treat the
differing views of others with respect. While a tolerance towards the opinions
of others does not preclude expressions of disagreement, which are, indeed,
encouraged, it does require that these expressions be based on the content
of the ideas expressed and not on the personal traits or values of the
speaker. All class participants will be expected to tolerate the expression
of opposing views and to engage in reasoned discourse about them.
I will endeavor to ensure that the classroom
is free of any conduct that has the purpose or effect of creating an intimidating
or hostile environment. Furthermore, I will attempt to give each student
an opportunity to express his or her own opinions and to treat student
opinions with respect. Any student who believes that he or she has not
been given fair or adequate opportunity to contribute to class discussion
is encouraged to bring this to my attention.
I am genuinely interested in student development
and the generation of critical understanding of the issues addressed in
this course. If you have any questions or problems and would like to discuss
them with me, please call me, visit me during my office hours, or make
an appointment to meet with me at a mutually convenient time and location.
If problems arise that may affect your performance in this course (e.g.
academic, health, family, or other personal matters), it is important that
you bring these issues to my attention when they arise and not wait until
they interfere with some class exercise such as a paper or an exam. I am
eager to assist you in making this an interesting and beneficial educational
experience.
READINGS | |||||||
Week 1 January 17 |
|||||||
Introduction: Law, Legality And Rights | |||||||
Week 2 & 3 January 24 & 28 |
|||||||
The Foundation For Law (Anywhere) | |||||||
Bentham | Anarchical Fallicies | ||||||
HLA Hart | Concept of Law (Chapters 5 and 6) | ||||||
Are There Any Natural Rights? | |||||||
International Law (From The Concept of Law) | |||||||
Dworkin | A New Philosophy For International Law | ||||||
Text | Modern International Law: Introdiction And Overview | ||||||
Week 3 & 4 January 31 - Feb 4 & 7 |
Underlying Models of Justice and Legitimacy | ||||||
Locke | Second Treatise On Government | ||||||
Rousseau | Chapters 1-5, 7-8,11,18,19 | ||||||
Essay on Inequality | |||||||
Kant | Perpetual Peace (pp 60-95) | ||||||
Bentham | Principles of Morals And Legislation (Preface and I-IV inclusive) | ||||||
Mill | Selections From On Liberty | ||||||
Week 5 |
The Role of Justice, If Any, In Global Relations | ||||||
Morgenthau | The Twilight of International Morlaity | 5 | |||||
Stanley Hoffman | Duties Beyond Borders Chap 1 Ethics And International Affairs | 1 | |||||
Charles Beitz | Political Theory And International Relations Introduction And Part One | 2 | |||||
Marshall Cohen | Moral Skepticism And International Relations International Relations As The State of Nature | 3 | |||||
European Institute | Syrian Refugees: A Snapshot (Read The 4 Links: Home, Timeline etc) | 4 | |||||
Week 6 Feb 18-21 |
The Legal And Political Basis For Human Rights: Theory And Structure | ||||||
Beitz | Human Rights as a Common Concern | 5 | |||||
Jack Donnelly, | Human Rights As Natural Rights | 1 | |||||
Griffin | Discrepencies Between Philosphy And Law of Human Rights | 2 | |||||
Laura Dickinson | The Promise of Hybrid Courts | 3 | |||||
United Nations | International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights And In Particular Part III, Article 6: Right To Life |
4 | |||||
Charter and Covenant on Economic Social And Cultural Rights | 5 | ||||||
Convention Against Genocide And relevant sections of the Human Rights | 1 | ||||||
Macedo | Universal Jurisdiction | 2 | |||||
The International Criminal Court | Basic Documents | 3 | |||||
Background And History | 4 | ||||||
Legal Resources | 5 | ||||||
Week 7 |
The Legal And Political Basis For Human Rights: Practice The Prosecution of War Crimes And Genocide |
||||||
Andy Carvin | From Sideshow To Genocide Stories of theCambodian Holocaust The Khmer Rouge Years | 1 | |||||
Neil Kritz | Special Report: Rwanda: Accountability for War Crimes and Genocide | 2 | |||||
Samantha Powers | Bystanders To Genocide | 3 | |||||
Franck | Legitimacy | 4 | |||||
General Roméo Dallaire | Genocide: A Preventable Crime | 5 | |||||
Week 8 March 4-7 |
The Scope of Human Rights: Universal or Relative? | ||||||
Daniel Bell | Which Rights Are Universal Chapter 1 pp 23-105 | 1 | |||||
Charney | Response To Bell | 2 | |||||
Donnelly | Cultural Relativism And International Human Rights Part II | 3 | |||||
Claude Ake | The African Context of Civil Rights, vol. 34 Africa TodayNos. 1&2 (1987) | 4 | |||||
Thomas Franck | Is Personal Freedom A Western Value? |
5 | |||||
Mary Midgely | Trying Out One's New Sword (excerpt from Heart And Mind) | 1 | |||||
Yael Tamir | Hands Off Clitoridectomy: What Our Revulsion Reveals About Ourselves" | 2 | |||||
Reply To Tamir by | Nussbaum | Neuwirth | Kamm | George | & Her Response | 3, 4, 5, 1, 2 | |
US Immigration Proceeding | In Re Kasinga: Asylum Hearing of Potential FGM Victim | 3 | |||||
Week 9 March 18-21 |
The Subject of Human Rights: Individual Or Community (And Which Ones)? |
||||||
Martha Nussbaum | Sex And Social Justice (Oxford, 1999) Part Chapters Three And Four | 4 | |||||
JS Hawley | Sati: The Blessing And The Curse: The Burning Of Wives In India | 5 | |||||
United Nations | Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women | 1 | |||||
Covenant on Civil & Political Rights | Arts. 18-22 (Freedom of Religion) | 2 | |||||
Ismail Patel | Mis Representations of Islam: A Study of Salmon Rushdie's Satanic Verses | 3 | |||||
Salmon Rushdie | Inside the Mind of Jihadists | 4 | |||||
Ronald Dworkin | "Do We Have A Right To Pornography" | 5 | |||||
Carnegie Council On Ethics Dialogue of Honor Killings | |||||||
Leylâ Pervizat | In The Name of Honor | 1 | |||||
Zehra F. Arat | A Struggle On Two Fronts | 2 | |||||
Week 10 March 25-28 |
The Value And Rights of Community: Nationalism, Patriotism And Self Determination | ||||||
Richard Goodin | What is So Special about Our Fellow Countrymen? | 3 | |||||
Yael Tamir | Liberal Nationalism Chapters Five& Seven | 4 | |||||
Will Kymlicka | Multicultural Citizenship | 5 | |||||
Daniel Philpott | In Defense of Self-Determination | 1 | |||||
Alan Buchannan | Theories of Secession | 2 | |||||
Cass Sunstien | Constitutionalism and Secession | 3 | |||||
Week 11 April 1-4 |
Rights of Community And Its Limits: Sovereignty And Internvention | ||||||
Michael Walzer | The Moral Standing of the State | 4 | |||||
Charles Beitz | Nonintervention and Communal Integrity | 5 | |||||
Stephen Krasner | Sovereignty: Organized Hypocracy Chapter One And Two | 1 | |||||
John Rawls | The Law Of Peoples | 2 | |||||
David Fagelson | Two Concepts of Sovereignty: From Westphalia to the Law of Peoples? | 3 | |||||
Recommended Further Reading | |||||||
Thomas Franck | The Emerging Right to Democratic Governance | ||||||
Week 12 April 8 - 11 |
Dirty Hands: Torture and Terrorism | ||||||
Patrick Lee | Interrogational Torture | 4 | |||||
Walzer | Dirty Hands (The Article) | 5 | |||||
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philsophy | Doctrine of Double Effect | 1 | |||||
Bentham | What is Utility? | 2 | |||||
USG Report To UN Committee On Torture | American Legislation Banning Torture | 3 | |||||
John Yoo and Judge Bybee | Justice Department Memos on Torture | 4 | |||||
General Tagube | Report on Abu Ghraib | 5 | |||||
Geneva Convention Third Article 1949 | International Law On Torture | 1 | |||||
Hassan | An Arsenal of Believers: Talking To Human Bombs | 2 | |||||
Week 13 April 15-18 |
International Justice And Aiding the poor? | ||||||
Peter Singer | Famine Affluence And Morality | 3 | |||||
Onora O'Neil | Lifeboat Earth | 4 | |||||
Garrett Harden | Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping The Poor | 5 | |||||
Fagelson | The Ethics of Assistance: What's The Good of It? | 1 | |||||
Week 14 April 26-29 |
Catch Up And Review | ||||||
Thomas Nagel War And Massacre
George Mavrodes Conventions And The Morality of War
Robert Fullwinder War And Innocence
Lawrence Alexander Self Defense And The Killing of Non-Combatants
John Rawls, The Law of The Peoples (Harvard, 1999) Part I §3 -- II.§10 inclusive.
Part One Part Two
Week 14
April 26
Globalization Multiculturalism, Tolerance And Equality
Michael Walzer On Tolerance Chapters Two & Three
Joseph Carens Culture, Citizenship, and Community : A Contextual Exploration
of Justice As Evenhandedness Parts One, Two & Three
Week 14
Global Justice And The Law Of The Peoples?John Rawls, The Law of The Peoples (Harvard, 1999) Part I §3 -- II.§10 inclusive.
Part One Part Two
David Fagelson Two Concepts of Sovereignty: From Westphalia To The Law of Peoples
Internet Resources for Human Rights Issues