American Legal Culture
JLS. 225
Professor Fagelson
Fall 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

MATERIALS


All the materials assigned for this class will be available for download either from this web page or from the course documents section of the class Blackboard Website. If you have not already enrolled yourself for this class on the Blackboard site you should do so now/



 

COURSE DESCRIPTION



 

  1. Content



This course will critically examine the role of law in American society. We will consider the nature and authority of law, how we ought to interpret what our law is and the relationship of law to different visions of morality and politics. In addition to considering different ideas about the role of law in American society, we will also consider the way in which these different schools feel about specific issues of individual freedom, equality and the role of the state in regulating behavior. While readings may include judicial opinions from time to time, the focus will be on the underlying conceptual and normative questions which shape our understanding of what the law is or what it ought to be in American society.

Three underlying questions will be continually addressed during the course of the semester

    What is law?
    How do we know what the law is?
    Why should we take any notice of what the law says?




  1. Skills


This course is designed not only to teach you the ideas of others but also to help you develop and present your own ideas. Class discussions will help you to articulate your thoughts on issues presented in the reading and to anticipate objections. The writing assignments are designed to help you learn to formulate your arguments clearly and concisely. Making the effort to state your meaning precisely in writing will help you in thinking through your arguments.

The specific learning objectives for the course, as articulated by the General Education Program are:

  1. explore the diverse historical and philosophical traditions that have shaped the contemporary Western world
  2. read and discuss fundamental texts from those traditions, situating the texts in their appropriate intellectual contexts
  3. develop your ability to critically and comparatively reflect on religious and philosophical issues, in dialogue with others both past and present.





 



  1. Requirements



      1. Active class participation: all students are expected to attend class regularly and to be prepared to discuss the reading. Students may be called upon to participate in class and no passing is permitted. Each student will be allowed 2 un-excused absences. Thereafter, each un-excused absence will reduce your final grade by one level (e.g. B+ to B). Excuses for absences will only be given for documented illness or deaths in the family. Study the class calendar carefully to make sure that you don't have any prior commitments that would preclude you from meeting these requirements. There may be several unannounced quizzes on the reading which will be counted towards the participation grade.

      2. There will be an analytical paper assignment (approx 4-6 pages). You may revise it based on my substantive comments . Your paper will then be regraded and the new grade will replace the original grade if it is higher. The essay should be concise, neat (typed, double spaced), free of grammatical and spelling errors, and submitted on time. Use of a style manual such as William Strunk & E.B. White, The Elements of Style, is required.

      3. There will be a midterm and a final exam.

      4. Papers must be submitted on the dates specified on the syllabus. It is your responsibility to make sure that sudden emergencies do not prevent you from submitting it on time. Late papers will be marked downwards on the basis of 1 grade per day. Because you have the option to re write your paper for a new grade it is always in your interest to submit your paper on time even if the paper is not completed to your satisfaction. You may rewrite your paper for a higher grade but deductions for late submissions will also reduce your rewritten paper. While rewritten papers normally result in higher grades resubmitted papers that have not actually been rewritten will receive a lower grade than the original paper. Merely correcting typographical or spelling errors does not count as a re written paper. Students who want to rewrite their papers must meet with me first to discuss my comments and your ideas about the paper.

      5. Tests must be taken on the scheduled dates. The date of the final exam is listed in the academic calander posted on the registrar's web page.. Please make sure you do not purchase any non-refundable tickets home or make any other plans that will take you out of town before that date. Exceptions will be made only in cases of documented illness. When such documentation is provided, the student will be excused from that exam and the final grade will be calculated from the other existing bases for evaluation.


  1. Grading Exercises And Dates of Assignment
 

 

Exercise Weight Towards
Final Grade
Date Assigned Date Due Returned
 
Test 20% October 3   October 10
Analytical Paper 1 20% October 10 October 24 October 31
Analytical Paper 2 20% November 3 November 17 November 24
Class Participation 20% Passim
Final exam
20% December 12-- 11:30am-1:50 (§2) / December 12-- 2:30pm-5:00pm (§1)

 

 



  1. Standards
 
 
   

    Grading standards are in part subjective and excellence in one area may compensate for deficiencies in another. No curve will be used to calculate the grades in this class. Hence, it is theoretically possible for every student to receive an A if he or she meets the standards for that grade. My primary goals are for each student to develop the critical thinking skills and to understand the ideas covered in this course by the time it is completed. If later exams and papers illustrate this proficiency, earlier grades which do not will be discounted. The following will give you a general guide to the typical performance associated with each letter grade.

      A: all course requirements met, work shows full understanding of course material and an original perspective on the subject

      B: all course requirements met, work shows full understanding of course material (or satisfactory understanding of course material and an original perspective on the subject)

      C: all course requirements met, work shows satisfactory understanding of course material

      D: work fails to meet minimum course requirements, either in full and timely completion of requirements or in satisfactory understanding of course material

      F: work falls far below minimum course requirements either in full and timely completion of requirements or in satisfactory understanding of course material.


  1. University and Classroom Standards

     

    The American University's "Academic Integrity Code" governing standards for academic conduct apply. Students may discuss the subject matter of their essays with anyone. All students, however, must compose their own essays and may not show or read their essays to any other persons, except for proofreading or typing assistance by a person not enrolled or previously enrolled in the course. The use of another person's words or ideas without proper attribution constitutes plagiarism or false authorship. Both are serious academic offenses. By turning in an essay, a student is certifying that the essay is entirely his/her own work. If there are any questions about this matter, consult the Academic Integrity code or see the instructor.



***************


Freedom of expression is at the root of academic discourse and the advancement of knowledge. This course will deal with a wide range of topics, some of which may challenge a student's deeply held beliefs and perhaps even cause offense. While no topic will be censored simply because it has these effects, students are expected to treat the differing views of others with respect. While a tolerance towards the opinions of others does not preclude expressions of disagreement, which are, indeed, encouraged, it does require that these expressions be based on the content of the ideas expressed and not on the personal traits or values of the speaker. All class participants will be expected to tolerate the expression of opposing views and to engage in reasoned discourse about them.

I will endeavor to ensure that the classroom is free of any conduct that has the purpose or effect of creating an intimidating or hostile environment. Furthermore, I will attempt to give each student an opportunity to express his or her own opinions and to treat student opinions with respect. Any student who believes that he or she has not been given fair or adequate opportunity to contribute to class discussion is encouraged to bring this to my attention.

I am genuinely interested in student development and the generation of critical understanding of the issues addressed in this course. If you have any questions or problems and would like to discuss them with me, please call me, visit me during my office hours, or make an appointment to meet with me at a mutually convenient time and location. If problems arise that may affect your performance in this course (e.g. academic, health, family, or other personal matters), it is important that you bring these issues to my attention when they arise and not wait until they interfere with some class exercise such as a paper or an exam. I am eager to assist you in making this an interesting and beneficial educational experience.






READINGS



Author/Case

Source






part one: introduction: what is law and how do we know it?
 

    August 29   Introduction: The Elements of Law and Obligation  


part two: political foundations of american law: democracy theory
 
     

    September 1-8
           
    Bork
  Neutral Interpretation And Some First Amendment Problems
 
 

Ely

 

Democracy & Distrust

 
 


West

  Critique of Democracy  
 

Burke

  Speech To The Electors of Bristol.  
           
    September 12-15        
           
           
 

Sunstein

  Republic of Reason  
 

Dworkin

  Moral Reading of the Constitution  
 

Legal Case

  Baker v. Carr (1962)(1)  
    Legal Case   Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission  
       

Read only
1) Court Opinion Section A1 (pp 25-28 inclusive)
2) Scalia Concurence (pp 1-9 inclusive)
3) Stevens Dissent (pp 28-41 inclusive)

 
   
   
December 5
part three: moral foundations of american law: concepts of justice
       
  September 19-22    
       
  Bentham Anarchical Fallacies  
    Principles of Morals And Legislation ( pp1-26)  

J.S.Mill

On Liberty (Chapter 4 On The Limits of The Authority of Society...)

 
    On Utilitarianism (Chapters 1-3 Inclusive and Chapter 5)  

Nozick

Anarchy, State & Utopia (excerpt)

 
  Dworkin Liberal Community  

 

 

 
     
  September 26-29  
     
  Walzer Communitarian Critique of Liberalsim
  Kristol Gladiators And Community Values
  Legal Sources Declaration of Rights of Man
  Legal Sources VA Declaration of Rights
     
  October 3-6  
     
  Devlin Morals And The Criminal Law
  Hart Immorality and Treason  
  Feinberg Ride on The Bus
 

Legal Case

Dredd Scott v. Samford (1857)class website

 
 

Legal Case

Loving v. Virginia (1967)  
 

Legal Case

Lochner v. New York (1905)  


part four: theories of constitutional interpretation



  October 10-13    
       
 

Brest --

Misconceived Quest For The Original Unicerstanding

 
  Bork The Impossibility of Departing From Original Understanding  
 

Dworkin --

Matter of Principle

 
     
     
  October 17-20  
  Schauer -- Easy Cases
 

Tushnet

Following The Rules Laid Down Part III pp 804-827

 
 

Levinson

Interpreting The Ten Commandments

 
 

Legal Case

Brown v. Board of Education

 
       
 
 
 
 
part five: perfectionism --
 
  Formalism And The Realist Response  
       
  October 24-27      
       

Langdell

Preface To Law On Contracts

 
 

Field

Magnitude And Importance of Legal Science

 
` Schauer Formalism (Part II Only)  
       
 

Frank

Realism

 
 

Llewellyn

Bramble Bush

 
 

Altman

Legal Realism,

 
       
Law And Economics  
       
  October 31-November 3    
       
  Murphy & Coleman Law And Economics  
 

Posner

Economic Approach To Law

 
 

Legal Case

Lochner v. New York (1905)

 

Legal Case

US v. Carroll Towing

 
       
       
       
  Critical Legal Studies and Feminist Jurisprudence  


  November 7-10    
       


Gordon

Critical Legal Studies

 


Altman

Critical Legal Studies And Dworkin.

 


Legal Case

R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul (1992)

 


Legal Case

People v. Liberta (1984) (NY)

 


Legal Case

State of Florida v. Rider 449 So 2nd 1984

 


West

Jurisprudence And Gender

 


Sherry

Garvey & Aleinikoff, 532-568

 


MacKinnon

Garvey & Aleinikoff, 559-571

 




 


 


part seven: freedom of speech
       
  November 14-17      
       


JS Mill

On Liberty, Chapter 3

 


Sunstein

Speech in Welfare State

 


Dworkin

Pornography And Hate

 


Mackinnon

Only Words

 


Kristol

The Case For Censoship

 


Selected Cases On Free Speech

Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire (1942)  


 

Wooley v. Maynard (1977)  


 

Texas v Johnsonn

 


 

National Socialist Party v. Skokie

 


 

American Booksellers v. Hudnut (7th Cir.1986)

 




 
 
part eight:: defining and regulating individual behavior: abortion and sexual orientation.
 

 

 

 
       
  November 21-28    
       
  Judith Jarvis Thompson A Defense of Abortion  
  John Noonan The Root And Branch of Roe v Wade  
  Randy Barnett Justice Kennedy's Libertarian Revolution  
  John Finnis Law Morality And Sexual Orientation  
  Ronald Dworkin, Nagel, Rawls, Scanlon, Nozick & Thompson Right To Die, The Philosopher's Brief  
  Michael McConnell Right To Die and The Jurisprudence of Tradition  
  Selected Cases on Privacy    
       
    Griswold v. Connecticut (1965)  
    Eisenstadt V. Baird (1972)  
    Loving v. Virginia  
    Roe v Wade (1973)  
    Bowers V. Hardwick (1986)  
    Lawrence v. Texas (2003)  
    Washington v. Gluksberg    
    US. v. Windsor  




 
part nine: equality in america
       
  December 1-5    
       
  Rawls Theory of Justice  
  Nozick Excerpt Anarchy State And Utopia  
  Sen Capabilities and Equality   
  Derrick Bell Racism And Inequality  
  Walzer Complex Equality (chapter 1 pp 1-30)  
  Legal Cases Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)  
    Brown v. Board of Education (1954)  
    University of CA Regents v. Bakke(1978)  
    Gratz v Bollinger  
    Harris v. Forklift Systems(1993)  
    Citizens United v. FEC (2010)  
    Shelby County v. Holder (2013)  
       
       
  December 9    
    Makeup And Review  
       
part ten: private property, freedom of contract and their impact on american legal culture  
 


Locke

Arthur & Shaw, 438-443

 
 

Nozick

Anarchy State & Utopia

 

 

Honoré

ALC Anthology, Property Title

 

 

Legal Case

Korematsu v. United States (1944)

 

 

 

Marsh v. Alabama (1946)class website

 
    Kelo v. City of New London  

 

Commodification

Dworkin, 145-161

 

 

In The Matter of Baby M

Arthur & Shaw, 476-484

 

 



 


Catch up And Review


 
     
 

 

 

 

United States Department of Justice Secret Memo Authorizing Torture



1 All cases are in US federal courts unless otherwise indicated with a state abbreviation. Cases can be found on the Web at several sites including Lexis-Nexis,FindLaw, Cornell Law School ., & The Meta-Index for U.S. Legal Research Other interesting websites containing important legal documents include: The Founders Constitution and The Avalon Project at the Yale Law School