American Legal Culture
JLS. 225
Professor Fagelson
Fall 2016
|
|
|
|
This course is designed not only to teach you the ideas of others but also to help you develop and present your own ideas. Class discussions will help you to articulate your thoughts on issues presented in the reading and to anticipate objections. The writing assignments are designed to help you learn to formulate your arguments clearly and concisely. Making the effort to state your meaning precisely in writing will help you in thinking through your arguments. The specific learning objectives for the course, as articulated by the General Education Program are:
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grading standards are in part subjective and excellence in one area may compensate for deficiencies in another. No curve will be used to calculate the grades in this class. Hence, it is theoretically possible for every student to receive an A if he or she meets the standards for that grade. My primary goals are for each student to develop the critical thinking skills and to understand the ideas covered in this course by the time it is completed. If later exams and papers illustrate this proficiency, earlier grades which do not will be discounted. The following will give you a general guide to the typical performance associated with each letter grade. A: all course requirements met, work shows full understanding of course material and an original perspective on the subject B: all course requirements met, work shows full understanding of course material (or satisfactory understanding of course material and an original perspective on the subject) C: all course requirements met, work shows satisfactory understanding of course material D: work fails to meet minimum course requirements, either in full and timely completion of requirements or in satisfactory understanding of course material F: work falls far below minimum course requirements either in full and timely completion of requirements or in satisfactory understanding of course material. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The American University's "Academic Integrity Code" governing standards for academic conduct apply. Students may discuss the subject matter of their essays with anyone. All students, however, must compose their own essays and may not show or read their essays to any other persons, except for proofreading or typing assistance by a person not enrolled or previously enrolled in the course. The use of another person's words or ideas without proper attribution constitutes plagiarism or false authorship. Both are serious academic offenses. By turning in an essay, a student is certifying that the essay is entirely his/her own work. If there are any questions about this matter, consult the Academic Integrity code or see the instructor. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
*************** |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Freedom of expression is at the root of academic discourse and the advancement of knowledge. This course will deal with a wide range of topics, some of which may challenge a student's deeply held beliefs and perhaps even cause offense. While no topic will be censored simply because it has these effects, students are expected to treat the differing views of others with respect. While a tolerance towards the opinions of others does not preclude expressions of disagreement, which are, indeed, encouraged, it does require that these expressions be based on the content of the ideas expressed and not on the personal traits or values of the speaker. All class participants will be expected to tolerate the expression of opposing views and to engage in reasoned discourse about them. I will endeavor to ensure that the classroom is free of any conduct that has the purpose or effect of creating an intimidating or hostile environment. Furthermore, I will attempt to give each student an opportunity to express his or her own opinions and to treat student opinions with respect. Any student who believes that he or she has not been given fair or adequate opportunity to contribute to class discussion is encouraged to bring this to my attention. I am genuinely interested in student development and the generation of critical understanding of the issues addressed in this course. If you have any questions or problems and would like to discuss them with me, please call me, visit me during my office hours, or make an appointment to meet with me at a mutually convenient time and location. If problems arise that may affect your performance in this course (e.g. academic, health, family, or other personal matters), it is important that you bring these issues to my attention when they arise and not wait until they interfere with some class exercise such as a paper or an exam. I am eager to assist you in making this an interesting and beneficial educational experience. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||
|
Author/Case |
Source |
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
part one: introduction: what is law and how do we know it? | |
August 29 | Introduction: The Elements of Law and Obligation | ||||
|
|||||
part two: political foundations of american law: democracy theory |
September 1-8 | ||||||
Bork | Neutral Interpretation And Some First Amendment Problems | |||||
|
Ely |
|||||
|
West |
Critique of Democracy | ||||
|
Burke |
Speech To The Electors of Bristol. | ||||
September 12-15 | ||||||
|
Sunstein |
Republic of Reason | ||||
|
Dworkin |
Moral Reading of the Constitution | ||||
Legal Case |
Baker v. Carr (1962)(1) | |||||
Legal Case | Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission | |||||
part three: moral foundations of american law: concepts of justice | |||||
September 19-22 | |||||
Bentham | Anarchical Fallacies | ||||
Principles of Morals And Legislation ( pp1-26) | |||||
|
J.S.Mill |
On Liberty (Chapter 4 On The Limits of The Authority of Society...) |
|||
On Utilitarianism (Chapters 1-3 Inclusive and Chapter 5) | |||||
|
Nozick |
||||
Dworkin | Liberal Community | ||||
|
|
|
|||
September 26-29 | |||||
Walzer | Communitarian Critique of Liberalsim | ||||
Kristol | Gladiators And Community Values | ||||
Legal Sources | Declaration of Rights of Man | ||||
Legal Sources | VA Declaration of Rights | ||||
October 3-6 | |||||
Devlin | Morals And The Criminal Law | ||||
Hart | Immorality and Treason | ||||
Feinberg | Ride on The Bus | ||||
Legal Case |
Dredd Scott v. Samford (1857)class website |
||||
Legal Case |
Loving v. Virginia (1967) | ||||
Legal Case |
Lochner v. New York (1905) | ||||
|
|||||
part four: theories of constitutional interpretation | |||||
|
|
||||
October 10-13 | |||||
Brest -- |
|||||
Bork | The Impossibility of Departing From Original Understanding | ||||
Dworkin -- |
|||||
October 17-20 | |||||
Schauer -- | Easy Cases | ||||
Tushnet |
|||||
Levinson |
|||||
Legal Case |
|||||
part five: perfectionism -- | |||||
Formalism And The Realist Response | |||||
October 24-27 | |||||
|
Langdell |
||||
Field |
|||||
` | Schauer | Formalism (Part II Only) | |||
Frank |
|||||
Llewellyn |
|||||
Altman |
|||||
Law And Economics | |||||
October 31-November 3 | |||||
Murphy & Coleman | Law And Economics | ||||
Posner |
|||||
Legal Case |
|||||
|
Legal Case |
||||
Critical Legal Studies and Feminist Jurisprudence | |||||
|
|||||
November 7-10 | |||||
|
Gordon |
||||
|
Altman |
||||
|
Legal Case |
||||
|
Legal Case |
||||
|
Legal Case |
||||
|
West |
||||
|
Sherry |
Garvey & Aleinikoff, 532-568 |
|||
|
MacKinnon |
Garvey & Aleinikoff, 559-571 |
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
part seven: freedom of speech | |||||
November 14-17 | |||||
|
JS Mill |
||||
|
Sunstein |
||||
|
Dworkin |
||||
|
Mackinnon |
||||
|
Kristol |
||||
|
Selected Cases On Free Speech |
Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire (1942) | |||
|
|
Wooley v. Maynard (1977) | |||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
part eight:: defining and regulating individual behavior: abortion and sexual orientation. | |||||
|
|
||||
November 21-28 | |||||
Judith Jarvis Thompson | A Defense of Abortion | ||||
John Noonan | The Root And Branch of Roe v Wade | ||||
Randy Barnett | Justice Kennedy's Libertarian Revolution | ||||
John Finnis | Law Morality And Sexual Orientation | ||||
Ronald Dworkin, Nagel, Rawls, Scanlon, Nozick & Thompson | Right To Die, The Philosopher's Brief | ||||
Michael McConnell | Right To Die and The Jurisprudence of Tradition | ||||
Selected Cases on Privacy | |||||
Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) | |||||
Eisenstadt V. Baird (1972) | |||||
Loving v. Virginia | |||||
Roe v Wade (1973) | |||||
Bowers V. Hardwick (1986) | |||||
Lawrence v. Texas (2003) | |||||
Washington v. Gluksberg | |||||
US. v. Windsor | |||||
|
|
|
|||
part nine: equality in america | |||||
December 1-5 | |||||
Rawls | Theory of Justice | ||||
Nozick | Excerpt Anarchy State And Utopia | ||||
Sen | Capabilities and Equality | ||||
Derrick Bell | Racism And Inequality | ||||
Walzer | Complex Equality (chapter 1 pp 1-30) | ||||
Legal Cases | Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) | ||||
Brown v. Board of Education (1954) | |||||
University of CA Regents v. Bakke(1978) | |||||
Gratz v Bollinger | |||||
Harris v. Forklift Systems(1993) | |||||
Citizens United v. FEC (2010) | |||||
Shelby County v. Holder (2013) | |||||
December 9 | |||||
Makeup And Review | |||||
part ten: private property, freedom of contract and their impact on american legal culture | |||||
|
Locke |
Arthur & Shaw, 438-443 |
|||
Nozick |
|||||
|
Honoré |
||||
|
Legal Case |
Korematsu v. United States (1944) |
|||
|
|
Marsh v. Alabama (1946)class website |
|||
Kelo v. City of New London | |||||
|
Commodification |
Dworkin, 145-161 |
|||
|
In The Matter of Baby M |
Arthur & Shaw, 476-484 |
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
Catch up And Review |
|
|||
|
---|
United States Department of Justice Secret Memo Authorizing Torture |
1 All cases are in US federal courts unless otherwise indicated with a state abbreviation. Cases can be found on the Web at several sites including Lexis-Nexis,FindLaw, Cornell Law School ., & The Meta-Index for U.S. Legal Research Other interesting websites containing important legal documents include: The Founders Constitution and The Avalon Project at the Yale Law School